Whose photo shoot was less "ethical?"
(click chicks for closer view)
PETA PETA PETA! Left, retouched professional porn star and leather-scorner Jenna Jameson. Right, retouched amateur porn star and lettuce-bikini-ed Pamela Anderson. Click on them and closely examine their faces and bodies. Who's image looks less like the actual woman? Who would you rather? Vote in the comments! Write funny quips with your votes! Take over this post, ye hilarious readers! (Fuck you, I'm tired.) update: If you want, also go to PollsBoutique to vote your choice.
posted by copyranter @ 12:45 PM
15 Comments:
Sorry I have met Jenna and she is a smart, educated and actually quite nice woman. That being said I would bang the pleather right off her. I have a soft (hard) spot for that 2008 Betty Page look. But now Pam Uhm it sound crazy I know but she is looking rougher and rougher lately. Plus there is the whole HepC (B D E F or something)thing. So it would take me a nano second longer to decide if the nude Pam in front of me doing her best hoover impersonation should be turned away. Being a oversexed american male I probably would say yes please but later while on my high horse I would deny anything took place. Because pffft "she hit the wall"
Pam's face looks awful.
But Jenna Jameson looks like a Bettie Page blow-up doll!
Her face is dead, no emotion or anything there.
I always liked Bettie Page photos.
There was a playfulness with them, she was having fun & it showed in the pix.
Not so here!
iagos: I make no assumptions about Jenna the person...but looking at that ad face compared to recent pics of her...look's like a completely different person.
This one is tough. Both are high-mileage vehicles with a lot of Bondo holding them together....
Jenna. I agree with her lack of follow through with the playfulness Betty put in, but Pam's fingernails scare the hell out of me. and I'd be afraid to pop her boobies. Hmm... remember the old beastie boys song... "she don't eat meat but she sure like the bone".
Why the hell did PETA turn to objectification of women though to sell their idea? I'm all for PETW. "I'm giong to be a veg cause it is trendy!" Yeah-go social consciousness go.
Is that even Jenna or the mail order mannequin version with 2 coats of Pledge? Both picts make my cock go 3-year old.
So does PETA really think that men are going to just stop eating meat because naked women tell them to? I thought it was Scientific Fact (tm) that they'll just eat pork chops on the sly while dousing their tofu in BBQ sauce.
That said, at least the Jenna ad has some kind of valid message you can pull from it if you try really really hard. "See guys? pleather can look as awesome as leather."
The Pamela one isn't saying a thing at all except "I got boobies so don't hurt animals guys."
Anonymous - I don't think it is as simple as peta trying to appeal to men here, in this oversexed society, it appeals to women just as much. Ever hear of female chauvinist pigs? As for the men, well it just gives them another way to objectify women - i mean just look at the first comment on this post.
-Amy
Keep clubbing the baby seals, and keep the free pinups coming.
Wait. Is silicone vegan?
I think Pam's insistence on continuing to have the blazing tan and coal-black eyes, along with years of bleaching her hair, have taken their toll.
Given the choice, I'd do the barstool. Both of those women have all these components of "sexy", but neither one has the charisma to make me wanna lez out.
And yeah, that doesn't so much look like Jenna Jameson as it looks like a version of Jenna Jameson culled from her own virtual sex game.
So what your saying it is pretty much like throwing a hotdog down a hallway...
"Turn over a new leaf..." and try the tuna.
I'm gonna write in a candidate: Dominique Swain. Mmmm, Fur!
http://www.peta.org/feat/pinup/dt/swain-800.jpg
can you dig up the PETA poster with David Cross? It's him naked with " wear your own fur" or something like that.
Post a Comment
<< Home