(nsfw) American Apparel's new porny pencil illustration ads.
(click ads, via) Cotton: the fabric of their underage? lives. Aw, how innocently sleazy. The artist is Boris Lopez, whose graphite pencil works have appeared in such cultured periodicals as Hustler's Barely Legal and Tight. The pants-optional CEO has a subscription to both. Anyway, with the above, and these graphic line drawing ads (nsfw), AA continues to try to spread their dirty creative wings. How 'bout some Manga next, Dovey? We know you got an Asian itch.
posted by copyranter @ 7:55 AM
19 Comments:
Went to the artist's website, he's also selling naked "portraits" of Taylor Swift, Hayden Panettiere and Alexis Bledel. Which I'm sure they didn't pose for.
American Apparel cotton panties retain their cameloe even when they're halfway down your leg.
Does the cotton industry association really want their trademarked symbol on this pervy nonsense?
A good question.
Wow, his other "portraits" border on pretty pornographic, almost child pornography with two young girls, no pubes posing with legs open... I think its super pervy....
All these girls look pretty young. There have been convictions for child porn involving cases of drawings and anime.
Is it just me or does the first drawing look like Taylor Momsen (Season 1 Gossip Girl age)?
Guys, we get it. American Apparel's CEO is pants-optional. WE GET IT.
No, you see I call him the "pants-optional CEO" because he's not wearing any pants in that photo I link to where I write "pants-optional CEO."
Wow, how many celebrities have unknowingly given their faces to his erotic sketches? Some are very...young...for this kind of thing.
Is cotton underwear sexy or comfy? Nekkid ladies won't change my mind.
Why the surprising use of Lopez graphite pencil renderings of damsels in undress?
Is it too much of a stretch to contemplate the pants-optional CEO to be a closeted Latin scholar and he's having the last perverse laugh?
'pencil' comes from the Latin word 'pencillus' which means 'little tail'.
this blog's still going on about american apparel
You're very observant. Are you park ranger?
Beautiful art with naked little girls. It's like that movie Knight and Day with Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz. You love Cameron but hate Tom. It makes my brain hurt!
It's hardly porn is it!?
The reason the pictures are offensive is because they're really badly drawn!
Go to any art gallery and you'll see paintings going back hundreds of years of much more intimate images of young ladies (and men)... what's wrong with people !?
yeh thats definitely soft-core porn..im sure some weirdos are whackin it as we speak! Not me of course..anyway if this guys doin celebrity portraits too he's gotta be doin somethin illegal lol! not that a nude portrait is anything bad, or new for that matter, using it for ads is not only distasteful but is a risky move on the companys part
There needs to be a distinction between what is porn and not porn. Nude images by themselves are not porn if they are then every naked man or woman is indulging in porn.
Ed
Porn? We are in 2012...yes it s a step further the 50's and 60' s pinups...yes the Playboy illustration are now used for advertising...porn? Come on! Some video clips are worst than that!
Does this really bother people? Never seen naked girls before? I yearn for the day when the world will stop being so goddamn puritan.
This is good advertisement, both in content/brand message and in viral efficiency. If you feel offended then go live in a monastery as a monk/nun.
Post a Comment
<< Home